Destination Earth DESP Use Cases: DestinE Sea Ice Decision Enhancement (DESIDE) Project Management Plan D5.1
COMMENTS and ISSUES |
PDF This document is available in PDF format here. |
EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY CONTRACT REPORT |
EOX IT Services GmbH |
- AMENDMENT HISTORY
-
This document shall be amended by releasing a new edition of the document in its entirety.
The Amendment Record Sheet below records the history and issue status of this document.Table 1. Amendment Record Sheet ISSUE DATE REASON 0.1
10/12/2023
Initial in-progress draft
1.0
12/12/2023
First version
1.1
19/09/2024
Second version
1. Introduction
1.1. Purpose and Scope
This document represents the Project Management Plan (PMP) for the Destination Earth DESP Use Cases: DestinE Sea Ice Decision Enhancement (DESIDE) project 8482 with ESA contract 4000140320/23/I-NS.
1.2. Structure of the Document
- Chapter 2, Overview
-
This section provides an overview of the Destination Earth DESP Use Cases: DestinE Sea Ice Decision Enhancement (DESIDE).
1.3. Reference Documents
The following is a list of Applicable and Reference Documents with a direct bearing on the content of this document.
Reference | Document Details | Version |
---|---|---|
[SOW] |
Statement of Work Destination Earth DESP Use Cases selection - Round 1 |
1.0 |
[Proposal] |
Proposal No. 8482: DestinE Sea Ice Decision Enhancement (DESIDE) |
1.1 |
1.4. Terminology
The following terms have been used in this document.
Term | Meaning |
---|---|
Admin |
User with administrative capabilities on a platform. |
Code |
The codification of an algorithm performed with a given programming language - compiled to Software or directly executed (interpreted) within the platform. |
Discovery |
User finds products/services of interest to them based upon search criteria. |
Interactive Web Application |
An Interactive Application for analysis provided as a rich user interface through the user’s web browser. |
Key-Value Pair |
A key-value pair (KVP) is an abstract data type that includes a group of key identifiers and a set of associated values. Key-value pairs are frequently used in lookup tables, hash tables and configuration files. |
Object Store |
A computer data storage architecture that manages data as objects. Each object typically includes the data itself, a variable amount of metadata, and a globally unique identifier. |
Products |
EO data (commercial and non-commercial) and Value-added products. |
Software |
The compilation of code into a binary program to be executed within the platform on-line computing environment. |
User |
An individual using the services. |
Visualization |
To obtain a visual representation of any data/products held within the platform - presented to the user within their web browser session. |
Web Coverage Service (WCS) |
OGC standard that provides an open specification for sharing raster datasets on the web. |
Web Feature Service (WFS) |
OGC standard that makes geographic feature data (vector geospatial datasets) available on the web. |
Web Map Service (WMS) |
OGC standard that provides a simple HTTP interface for requesting geo-registered map images from one or more distributed geospatial databases. |
Web Map Tile Service (WMTS) |
OGC standard that provides a simple HTTP interface for requesting map tiles of spatially referenced data using the images with predefined content, extent, and resolution. |
Web Processing Services (WPS) |
OGC standard that defines how a client can request the execution of a process, and how the output from the process is handled. |
1.5. Glossary
The following acronyms and abbreviations have been used in this document.
Term | Definition |
---|---|
ADD |
Architecture Design Document |
AOI |
Area of Interest |
API |
Application Programming Interface |
COG |
Cloud optimized GeoTiff |
EO |
Earth Observation |
EOX |
EOX IT Services GmbH |
ESA |
European Space Agency |
FUSE |
Filesystem in Userspace |
ICD |
Interface Control Document |
JSON |
JavaScript Object Notation |
KVP |
Key-value Pair |
M2M |
Machine-to-machine |
OGC |
Open Geospatial Consortium |
PMP |
Project Management Plan |
REST |
Representational State Transfer |
SDD |
Software Design Document |
SFTP |
Secure File Transfer Protocol |
SRF |
Software Reuse File |
SRN |
Software Release Note |
SRP |
Software Release Plan |
SRS |
Software Requirements Specification |
SSH |
Secure Shell |
STAC |
Spatio-Temporal Asset Catalog |
SUM |
Software User Manual |
SVVP |
Software Verification and Validation Plan |
SVVR |
Software Verification and Validation Report |
TOI |
Time of Interest |
UMA |
User-Managed Access |
US |
User Story |
WCS |
Web Coverage Service |
WFS |
Web Feature Service |
WMS |
Web Map Service |
WMTS |
Web Map Tile Service |
WPS |
Web Processing Service |
WPS-T |
Transactional Web Processing Service |
2. Overview
Polar View Earth Observation Limited is working in collaboration with EOX IT Services, Drift+Noise Polar Services, the Danish Meteorological Institute, the Norwegian Meteorological Institute, and the Finnish Meteorological Institute to develop a fully functional Use Case that utilizes the DESP/DestinE system capabilities and data and adds value to meet the needs of policy and decision makers who require information on the past, current, and forecasted sea ice and other relevant conditions for operational purposes in the Baltic Sea, European Arctic Ocean, and the rest of the polar regions.
The Use Case will build on and complement existing operational and climate sea ice products and services including those provided by the Copernicus Marine Service, the national Ice Services, the ESA Polar Thematic Exploitation Platform (Polar TEP), and the commercial Drift+Noise IcySea app. The Use Case will augment and improve on the current offerings by:
-
Aggregating information of different types and from different sources to provide common products that span jurisdictional boundaries.
-
Producing new products that will improve the ability of users to make good decisions.
-
Making the products available in ways and means that are appropriate for the skills and requirements of different user communities.
One driver for the project is the regulation of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) of the United Nations mandating that ships operating in the polar regions meet certain requirements (the Polar Code). Among other things, the Polar Code specifies a range of information that ships traveling in polar waters are required to access for planning and operations. The Use Case will demonstrate the value of short and medium-term forecasts of sea ice, meteorological, and ocean conditions suitable for strategic and tactical decision making by ships and their owners.
A second driver for the project is the effect of climate change on polar conditions that will impact long-term planning and policy development for polar operations such as fishing, tourism, scientific research campaigns, oil and gas development, and supplying northern communities. The Use Case will deliver long-term forecasts of how changing sea ice and other conditions will affect where different types of ships will be able to travel in the polar regions compared to historical averages.
Benefits to polar operations and the rest of society will include increased safety of life and property, decreased pollution, and protection of sensitive environmental areas.
This document presents the Project Management Plan (D5.1) for that work. It contains the following sections:
-
Work Description
-
Team Organization
-
Schedule
-
Deliverables
This is a living document and will be updated continuously and presented at each milestone (see Section 5.1, “Milestones”).
3. Work Description
The Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) of the project consists of four Work Packages:
-
WP1 Project Management
-
WP2 Agile Use Case Development and Demonstration
-
WP3 Use Case Promotion
-
WP4 Use Case Exploitation
The Work Packages and their constituent tasks are described in the tables below.
Project: DestinE Sea Ice Decision Enhancement (DESIDE) |
||
WP Title: Project Management |
WP No: 1 |
|
Start Event: KO |
Start Date: KO |
WP Leader: David Arthurs |
End Event: FR |
End Date: KO+12 months |
Level of Effort: 649 hours |
WP Objectives: Manage the activity and ensure all tasks are executed on time, on budget and on schedule according to the Project Management Plan. Contribute as necessary to all plans, processes, and tools for the execution and validation of the ESA-DEUC project. |
||
Tasks |
Responsible |
|
WP 1.1: Project Management and Control
|
David Arthurs |
|
WP 1.2: Client Communications
|
David Arthurs |
|
WP 1.3: Project Deliverables
|
David Arthurs |
|
WP 1.4: Project Meetings
|
David Arthurs |
|
Inputs |
From |
|
SoW |
RHEA |
|
ESA-DEUC Project Management Plan Documentation |
RHEA |
|
Proposal |
Polar View |
|
DESP Documents |
RHEA |
|
Deliverables |
Delivery Date |
|
D5.1 Project Management Plan |
KO, RR1, RR2, RR3 |
|
[PR] Progress Reports |
Monthly |
|
[QU] Quarterly Updates |
RR1, RR2, RR3 |
|
[FR] Final Report |
FR |
|
[CCD] Contract Closure Document |
FR |
Project: DestinE Sea Ice Decision Enhancement (DESIDE) |
||
WP Title: Agile Use Case Development and Demonstration |
WP No: 2 |
|
Start Event: KO |
Start Date: KO |
WP Leader: Stephan Meißl |
End Event: FR |
End Date: KO+12 months |
Level of Effort: 3,422 hours |
WP Objectives: Using an agile methodology, plan, specify, design, test, review, and launch the DESIDE Use Case. |
||
Tasks |
Responsible |
|
WP 2.1: End-User Engagement
|
Lasse Rabenstein |
|
WP 2.2: Software Development
|
Stephan Meißl |
|
WP 2.3: Open-Source Software Management
|
Stephan Meißl |
|
WP 2.4: DESP Developer Liaison
|
Stephan Meißl |
|
Inputs |
From |
|
ESA-DEUC-RS-23-03 Users Early Recommendations [RD-1] |
RHEA |
|
Proposal |
Polar View |
|
Users’ Feedback |
Polar View |
|
Deliverables |
Delivery Date |
|
[D5.2] Use Case Descriptor |
KO+1, RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
|
[D5.3] Use Case Application |
KO+1, RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
|
[SRS] Software Requirement Specifications |
KO+1, RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
|
[SVVP] Software Verification and Validation Plan |
KO+1, RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
|
[SVVR] Software Verification and Validation Report |
RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
|
[SRF] Software Reuse File |
RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
|
[SRP] Software Release Plan |
KO+1, RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
|
[D5.4] User Validation Report |
FR |
Project: DestinE Sea Ice Decision Enhancement (DESIDE) |
||
WP Title: Use Case Promotion |
WP No: 3 |
|
Start Event: KO |
Start Date: KO |
WP Leader: Lasse Rabenstein |
End Event: FR |
End Date: KO+12 months |
Level of Effort: 476 hours |
WP Objectives: Engage with users and promote awareness of the DestinE platform, applications and services. |
||
Tasks |
Responsible |
|
WP 3.1: Use Case Promotion Package
|
Lasse Rabenstein |
|
WP 3.2: DestinE Participation
|
David Arthurs |
|
Inputs |
From |
|
ESA-DEUC Promotion Package |
RHEA |
|
Deliverables |
Delivery Date |
|
[D5.5] Use Case Promotion Package |
RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
Project: DestinE Sea Ice Decision Enhancement (DESIDE) |
||
WP Title: Use Case Exploitation |
WP No: 4 |
|
Start Event: RR3 |
Start Date: KO +9 |
WP Leader: Lasse Rabenstein |
End Event: FR |
End Date: KO+12 months |
Level of Effort: 461 hours |
WP Objectives: Provide a roadmap for the optimal implementation and exploitation of the Use Case application throughout the development period and beyond. |
||
Tasks |
Responsible |
|
WP 4.1: Use Case Exploitation Roadmap
|
Lasse Rabenstein |
|
Inputs |
From |
|
[D5.3] Use Case Application |
WP 2 |
|
[D5.4] User Validation Report |
WP 2 |
|
[SRS] Software Requirements Specifications |
WP 2 |
|
Deliverables |
Delivery Date |
|
[D5.6] Use Case Exploitation Roadmap |
FR |
4. Team Organization
Polar View is the prime contractor and responsible for the overall execution of the proposed activity. The team members and their roles are as follows:
-
Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) – Coordination of decision support information for Greenland waters (Baffin Bay, Labrador Sea, Greenland Sea)
-
Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI) – Coordination of decision support information for the Baltic Sea.
-
Norwegian Meteorological Institute (MET Norway) – Coordination of decision support information for the Norwegian Sea and Barents Sea.
-
EOX – Lead for Software and responsible for Polar TEP and Polar Dashboard platforms.
-
Drift+Noise – Lead for End-users and responsible for the IcySea app that provides decision information to ships.
A critical aspect of the proposed work scope is the active and effective engagement of end-users concerned with polar and Baltic Sea operations. To this end, an end-user representative group has been established to provide advice to the technical team, articulate end-user information requirements, and review agile development output. The members of the end-user representative group are:
-
International Ice Charting Working Group (IICWG)
-
Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency
-
Ponant
-
Alfred Wegener Institute
-
Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP)
Polar View has assigned David Arthurs as the Project Manager to lead the proposed activity. The Project Manager will report to the Technical Officer assigned by RHEA on all aspects related to the planning and execution of the project. Where required, the Project Manager will interface with other contact points at RHEA and ESA. The Project Manager is supported by the Software and End-User Leads, Stephan Meißl and Lasse Rabenstein respectively. Each Lead will be responsible for all related tasks and deliverables and will interface as required with all task contributors.
Table 6, “Key Personnel Roles” shows the project team’s key personnel and their roles.
Name | Role |
---|---|
David Arthurs |
Project Manager |
Till Rasmussen |
Liaison, DMI products and services |
Marko Mäkynen |
Liaison, FMI products and services |
Øystein Godøy |
Liaison, MET Norway products and services |
Stephan Meißl |
Software lead |
Lasse Rabenstein |
End-Users lead |
5. Schedule
5.1. Milestones
The project started on 15 February 2024 and will proceed for 12 months. The timing of the project milestones is shown in Table 7, “Project Reviews” and illustrated in the bar chart of Figure 1, “Project Schedule”.
Review | Description | Deliverables | Schedule | Venue |
---|---|---|---|---|
RR 1 |
Focus on Polar TEP |
D5.1, D5.2, D5.3, D5.5, SRS, SVVP, SVVR, SRF, SRP |
29 April 2024 |
Virtual |
RR 2 |
Focus on Polar Dashboard |
D5.1, D5.2, D5.3, D5.5, SRS, SVVP, SVVR, SRF, SRP |
KO + 7 months |
Virtual |
RR 3 |
Focus on IcySea |
D5.1, D5.2, D5.3, D5.5, SRS, SVVP, SVVR, SRF, SRP |
KO + 9 months |
Virtual |
Final Review |
Focus on integration across Polar TEP, Polar Dashboard, and IcySea. Presentation of final project results. |
D5.1, D5.2, D5.3, D5.4, D5.5, D5.6, SRS, SVVP, SVVR, SRF, SRP, FR, CCD |
KO + 12 months |
Virtual |
5.2. Bar Chart
Figure 1, “Project Schedule” shows the project schedule, including all proposed Work Packages, meetings, deliverables, and progress reports.
6. Deliverables
All documentation will be delivered electronically in a format agreed with by Starion. Draft versions will be sent to the Technical Officer not later than two weeks before the documentation is to be presented.
The content of all documentation will, at a minimum, cover that outlined in the ITT and as guided by the Technical Officer.
Code | Title | Work Package | Delivery |
---|---|---|---|
D5.1 |
Project Management Plan |
KO+1, RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
|
D5.2 |
Use Case Description |
KO+1, RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
|
D5.3 |
Use Case Application (software) |
KO+1, RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
|
D5.4 |
User Validation Report |
FR |
|
D5.5 |
Use Case Promotion Package |
RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
|
D5.6 |
Use Case Exploitation Roadmap |
FR |
|
PR |
Progress Reports |
Monthly |
|
QU |
Updates |
Quarterly |
|
SRS |
Software Requirement Specification |
KO+1, RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
|
SVVP |
Software Verification and Validation Plan |
KO+1, RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
|
SVVR |
Software Verification and Validation Report |
RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
|
SRF |
Software Reuse File |
RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
|
SRP |
Software Release Plan |
KO+1, RR1, RR2, RR3, FR |
|
FR |
Final Report |
FR |
|
CCD |
Contract Closure Documentation |
FR |
<< End of Document >>